home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TeX 1995 July
/
TeX CD-ROM July 1995 (Disc 1)(Walnut Creek)(1995).ISO
/
tex-k
/
tex-k-archive.past
/
tex-k-archive.gz
/
tex-k-archive
/
000529_kb@cs.umb.edu_Wed May 4 02:21:59 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-10-11
|
2KB
Received: from terminus.cs.umb.edu by cs.umb.edu with SMTP id AA23190
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <tex-k-exp@cs.umb.edu>); Wed, 4 May 1994 08:31:02 -0400
Received: by terminus.cs.umb.edu id AA10707
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for tex-k); Wed, 4 May 1994 06:21:59 -0400
Date: Wed, 4 May 1994 06:21:59 -0400
From: "K. Berry" <kb@cs.umb.edu>
Message-Id: <199405041021.AA10707@terminus.cs.umb.edu>
To: pete@thi.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de
Cc: tex-k@cs.umb.edu
Subject: Re: Error in dvipsk-5.519b
First, 5.519b is old. Try 5.55a (ftp.cs.umb.edu:pub/tex).
# 4) to accelerate the work of XDvi and dvips (they search only one directory
The new ls-R feature should accelerate things even more than this,
without the overhead.
by ln (line #4). I say that dvips _does_ find any PK or whatever file, if it
does not, then there is something wrong.
Yes, certainly. And as you show below, what's wrong is simply the
compiled and/or config file paths. (kpathsea/INSTALL has some info on this.)
PK path: .:/usr/local/tex/lib/fonts/TFM//
I think this may have been a bug I fixed since. I know there were some
bugs in the config file path setting.
# almost original config.ps -- default definitions for dvips output.
It's still going to get overwritten, you realize, since you didn't
``change or delete'' the word `original'!
M LaserJetIV
You must have an old version of modes.mf. The `IV' was a mistake -- HP
has always used arabic numerals for the LJ4, hence the name is now `ljfour'.
#:/usr/local/tex/lib/dvips/.PFA:/usr/local/tex/lib/dvips/.PFB:/usr/local/tex/lib/fonts/pfb
Do you really like having directory names starting with .?
At Neal's suggestion, I was planning on having kpathsea ignore such
names in the next release, so it would be easy to eliminate dirs from
the searching without deleting them. Although generating ls-R is going
to be more painful. Hmm ...